Chapter 1: Literary Origins and The Roaring Trumpet Foundation
The phrase “Yngvi is a Louse!” emerged from L. Sprague de Camp and Fletcher Pratt’s novella “The Roaring Trumpet,” published in the May 1940 issue of Unknown magazine, where it appears as the hourly shout of “a demented prisoner in Surt’s dungeon.” This seemingly throwaway detail – a mysterious proclamation about an unknown figure – captured fannish imagination with its combination of inexplicable meaning and rhythmic memorability that made it perfect for adoption as community catchphrase.
The rapid fannish adoption, appearing “as early as the June 1940 issue of Le Zombie” just one month after original publication, demonstrated the community’s capacity for transforming obscure literary references into shared cultural markers. The phrase’s appeal lay not in its meaning – which remained deliberately mysterious – but in its potential for infinite interpretation and its function as insider knowledge that marked fannish sophistication and literary awareness within science fiction community discourse.
Chapter 2: Mythological Background and Scholarly Investigation
Dick Eney’s research revealed that “the name Yngvi originates in Scandinavian mythology,” connecting the phrase to legitimate historical and cultural traditions that provided depth beyond its fictional context. The appearance of Yngvi in E.R. Eddison’s “Mistress of Mistresses” (1935) – “Which of Yngvi’s line must with Odin fare, In Valhall to won” – demonstrated the name’s usage in serious fantasy literature that drew upon authentic mythological sources.
The Fancyclopedia 2 analysis by J. Fiske provided sophisticated etymological context, explaining that “in Scandinavian legend the primordial gods Odin, Vili and Ve were the progenitors of (respectively) the Norse, German, and English races, and ‘Ing’ or ‘Yng’ means roughly ‘the people of __’.” This scholarly investigation suggested that the original demented prisoner’s hourly proclamation might represent contemporary political commentary about English-haters during World War II, adding layers of historical and political meaning to what appeared as simple nonsense.
Chapter 3: The Denvention Democracy and Rothman’s Defeat
The 1941 Worldcon at Denvention witnessed the first formal democratic attempt to resolve Yngvi’s status when “Milt Rothman made a motion to the effect that Yngvi is not a louse, but it was defeated.” This parliamentary engagement with fictional character status represented remarkable integration of literary discussion with democratic process while demonstrating fandom’s willingness to apply formal governance procedures to essentially absurd questions.
The subsequent “motion was then passed stating that Rothman was a louse” revealed both fannish humor and the community’s commitment to democratic consequences – those who defended Yngvi might themselves be subject to the same accusations they sought to overturn. This precedent established important principles about the relationship between advocacy and personal risk in fannish political discourse while creating legendary moment that would influence subsequent democratic interventions.
Chapter 4: Elmer Perdue’s Gallant Defense Campaign
Elmer Perdue’s sustained defense of Yngvi “during Third Fandom days, asserting by sticker and otherwise that ‘Yngvi is NOT a louse!'” represented one of fandom’s earliest systematic advocacy campaigns for fictional character rehabilitation. Perdue’s use of stickers and other promotional materials demonstrated sophisticated understanding of political campaigning techniques while maintaining the essentially playful character that distinguished fannish politics from serious ideological conflict.
This defense campaign established important precedents for individual fans taking public positions on community issues while showing how sustained advocacy could maintain visibility for minority positions within dominant discourse. Perdue’s gallant efforts created romantic model of fannish chivalry while demonstrating that even hopeless causes could generate respect and admiration within community culture that valued persistence and principle over mere success.
Chapter 5: Interpretive Flexibility and Identity Confusion
The observation that “sometimes the statement that he is a louse is taken literally; sometimes Yngvi is confused with the little guy who didn’t like him” revealed the interpretive flexibility that made Yngvi useful as community symbol capable of supporting diverse meanings and applications. This confusion between accuser and accused, between the prisoner making proclamations and the figure being denounced, created productive ambiguity that enabled creative deployment across various fannish contexts.
The reference to “once it was said that Yngvi is a Type Fifteen Fan” demonstrated how the mysterious figure could be integrated into fannish taxonomy and social analysis, transforming literary reference into community classification system. This flexibility enabled Yngvi’s persistence across changing fannish cultures and generational transitions while maintaining essential mystery that prevented definitive resolution or boring clarity.
Chapter 6: The 1950 Philco Procedural Complications
The attempt to revisit Yngvi’s status at “the 1950 Philco but ruled out of order by Moskowitz, who misremembered that Rothman’s motion had carried” illustrated both the persistence of the issue and the complications that could arise from imperfect institutional memory. Moskowitz’s procedural ruling based on incorrect recollection created ironic situation where Yngvi’s fate depended on fallible human memory rather than democratic will or objective truth.
This incident demonstrated how procedural decisions could affect substantive outcomes while highlighting the importance of accurate record-keeping in maintaining democratic legitimacy. The ruling also showed how individual officials’ mistakes could influence community culture while creating precedents that might persist beyond their original justification, adding layers of institutional complexity to what began as simple literary reference.
Chapter 7: Sandy Sanderson’s Practical Application
Sandy Sanderson’s 1958 use of “Yngvi” as “ekename for a fan who’d been sending postcards to insurance companies advising them that Inchmeryites were good prospects, and getting salesmen to call” represented creative adaptation of the mysterious figure for practical community purposes. This application transformed abstract literary reference into concrete social tool for addressing problematic behavior while maintaining the playful distance that characterized fannish social control mechanisms.
The insurance company prank context showed how Yngvi could be deployed as euphemism for describing antisocial behavior without direct personal attack, enabling community criticism while preserving social relationships. This practical application demonstrated the phrase’s utility beyond mere literary reference or democratic theater, showing how fannish cultural markers could serve real social functions within community governance and behavior modification.
Chapter 8: Marvel Comics Cultural Penetration
The appearance of Yngvi in the 1973 Marvel comic “The Death-Dealing Mannikin” by Kit Pearson and Tony Isabella – where a villain uses the incantation “YNGVI—ISA—ESUOL” alongside mention of “DYKTAWO as the name of a demon” – demonstrated the phrase’s penetration into professional publishing and mainstream comic culture. This professional adoption validated fannish cultural creation while showing how community references could achieve broader recognition.
The backward spelling “ESUOL” and the inclusion of DYKTAWO (OWTAYDK backwards) indicated sophisticated fannish knowledge among the comic creators while creating legitimate commercial deployment of community inside jokes. This cultural crossover demonstrated how fannish creativity could influence professional media while maintaining insider appreciation that rewarded community knowledge and historical awareness.
Chapter 9: The Chicon 7 Revival and Modern Democracy
The 2012 Worldcon Chicon 7 attempt to pass a motion that “Yngvi is not a louse” represented remarkable revival of 71-year-old democratic tradition while demonstrating continued relevance of fannish historical consciousness and procedural engagement. The “small-scale campaign including ribbons and bookmarks” showed sophisticated understanding of political mobilization techniques while maintaining appropriately playful scale for essentially absurd proposition.
The decisive defeat of the motion “leaving poor Yngvi still a louse” preserved historical continuity while validating democratic process that had consistently rejected rehabilitation attempts. The appearance of ribbons designating the motion makers as lice created delicious irony that recalled the original Rothman precedent while showing how fannish political culture could maintain consistent patterns across multiple generations and cultural transitions.
Chapter 10: Enduring Mystery and Democratic Legacy
Yngvi’s persistence as fannish cultural institution reflects the community’s capacity for maintaining playful traditions that serve multiple functions – providing insider knowledge markers, enabling democratic participation practice, creating opportunities for historical continuity, and offering outlets for creative interpretation that transcend original literary context. The figure’s essential mystery prevents definitive resolution while enabling continued engagement across changing community contexts.
The democratic tradition surrounding Yngvi’s status demonstrates how fannish communities can create and maintain institutional practices that serve educational and cultural functions while preserving essential playfulness that distinguishes community governance from serious political conflict. The consistent rejection of rehabilitation motions establishes important precedent about the permanence of some community decisions while showing how democratic engagement can serve ceremonial and cultural functions that transcend immediate practical outcomes. Yngvi’s legacy as eternal louse provides lasting symbol of fannish creativity, democratic engagement, and cultural continuity that connects contemporary community members with historical traditions while enabling ongoing participation in shared cultural creation that defines science fiction fandom’s distinctive character and institutional memory.
Leave a Reply